What is the point of Rule 1:28, really?


As we noted on our last entry, the recent Rule 1:28 decision Martin v. Martin is sparse on facts, a chronic condition of the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s “unreported” decisions, leaving us often thinking that “we must be missing something”. Martin was no exception. Today, we ask, as we have obliquely in the past, what is the point of Rule 1:28 anyway?
http://bit.ly/1NipY9b

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kissimmee: Process Cooling for Manufacturing (Kissimmee, FL)

Allamuchy Mayor Gives Proclamation for 15 years of Giving Back

Mobile Generators: The Rent Vs Buy Decisions