What is the point of Rule 1:28, really?


As we noted on our last entry, the recent Rule 1:28 decision Martin v. Martin is sparse on facts, a chronic condition of the Massachusetts Appeals Court’s “unreported” decisions, leaving us often thinking that “we must be missing something”. Martin was no exception. Today, we ask, as we have obliquely in the past, what is the point of Rule 1:28 anyway?
http://bit.ly/1NipY9b

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KOHLER’s Newest KD Series industrial Generator - Wareham, MA

Kissimmee: Process Cooling for Manufacturing (Kissimmee, FL)

The Top Four Things You Need to Know about 529 Plans