DeMarco v. DeMarco: Three Surprising Things


Michael DeMarco asked Judge Casey to terminate his alimony obligation to Katherine DeMarco, under M.G.L., ch. 208, §49(f), the social security full retirement age provision of the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3/1/12). The judge advised the parties at the start of trial that he believed the result to be foregone: that §49(f) applies to all cases, and therefore, DeMarco alimony would end. The attorneys adopted the court’s view and devised a surviving settlement agreement with a terminal lump sum payment, and the end of periodic alimony.
http://bit.ly/1JLnoeL

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New TexStar Chiropractic Clinic Hours - Austin, TX

Mobile Generators: The Rent Vs Buy Decisions

Happy Holidays from JB Pride Electrical