DeMarco v. DeMarco: Three Surprising Things


Michael DeMarco asked Judge Casey to terminate his alimony obligation to Katherine DeMarco, under M.G.L., ch. 208, §49(f), the social security full retirement age provision of the Alimony Reform Act (eff. 3/1/12). The judge advised the parties at the start of trial that he believed the result to be foregone: that §49(f) applies to all cases, and therefore, DeMarco alimony would end. The attorneys adopted the court’s view and devised a surviving settlement agreement with a terminal lump sum payment, and the end of periodic alimony.
http://bit.ly/1JLnoeL

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kissimmee: Process Cooling for Manufacturing (Kissimmee, FL)

Allamuchy Mayor Gives Proclamation for 15 years of Giving Back

Mobile Generators: The Rent Vs Buy Decisions